Chan on ‘Mother Church’

“If the church’s existence is not purely creaturely but a ‘divine-humanity,’ then we need to spell out its link with the triune God more precisely if we are to understand its true nature and function. For the role or function of the church grows out of its ontological status as a divine-humanity. This ontological status is sometimes expressed in the concept of Mother Church, made famous by Cyprian: ‘He who has not the Church for his mother, has not God for his Father.’ That is to say, the church is our nourishing Mother, and we are entirely dependent on her for our existence as Christians. We are not saved as individuals first and then incorporated into the church; rather, to be a Christian is to be incorporated into the church by baptism and nourished with the spiritual food of the body and blood of Christ in the Eucharist. Failure to understand this fact has led to a reduction of the church’s role to a largely sociological one of a service provider catering to individual believers’ spiritual needs.

Simon Chan, Liturgical Theology (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 2006), 24 (emphasis added).

Posted in Bible-Theology | Leave a comment

Links: 10 July 2015

Today’s general theme seems to be the so-called “Millennial” generation, of which I am a member.

Majestic Protests from a Magisterial Protestant; or, someone needs to harass Don Miller some more, so it might as well be me.

Hey Guys, I’m a Young Person and I Have Opinions (Rachel Held Evans, Millennials, Etc.): “It seems to me — and I’m just spitballing here — that if we’re genuinely trying to find Jesus, the best place to start is where Jesus himself promised to be — that is, in the bread and the wine of the Eucharist. After all, if we can’t even trust the guy on where he’s going to be, is he even worth tracking down?”

Aziz Ansari: Love, Online Dating, Modern Romance and the Internet.

Oxford, abortion and the closing of the Western mind: What the Oxford debate scandal reveals about modern censorship.

Yes, My Grown Homeschooled Children Are Odd – And Yours Will Be Too!

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

Titles, Jobs, and Self-Identity

Today is my third day back at ICON Clinical Research. If you have followed this blog for any length of time (or if you know me in the flesh-and-blood world), you probably know that I worked at ICON for eight years while in seminary and graduate school before finally jumping into life as a full-time assistant professor at LCC International University last year. My father-in-law’s health has taken a dramatic turn for the worse, however, and my wife and I have returned from Lithuania to Pennsylvania to live near my in-laws and help with his care and their move to a different home. I am officially on medical leave from the university for the fall term, but the possibility that we will return for the spring term seems more remote each day as he declines and as we get a fuller picture of their finances.

When we knew in March that we’d be taking leave from LCC, I contacted my former manager at ICON and asked if there were some role that I could jump into as a contractor or a temp for six months or so. He eagerly said, “Give me three weeks, and let me see what I can do,” and sure enough, a few weeks later he had a contract for me: my old pay rate, with benefits, for six months with the possibility of renewal.

I have no doubt in my mind and heart that this is God’s provision for us during this time. It is a blessing to be able to pick up meaningful, interesting work that pays quite well, rather than having to work at Starbucks for insurance. I liked my ICON coworkers, and most of them are still here (some did a double-take when they saw me in the hall).

But I can’t deny that it is very difficult to set aside the professorial life for now. I had prepared for so long and worked so hard in graduate school while working full time (not to mention all the sacrifices my wife made), and God opened all the doors and smoothed the way for us to get to LCC–and now, apparently, is taking it all back. I admit that I’m angry sometimes. It’s hard enough to see a loved one suffer and decline, but then to have to move again and change careers again while that is happening–everything is compounded. This is probably a post for another time, but God has taught me a lot over the last few months about his sovereignty and his plans for us (or, you can listen to my recent sermon). My anger is selfish, and the Holy Spirit is working to rid me of it.

___

I’d say that academia is particularly difficult to transition in and out of as a career, for a few reasons. First, research and teaching momentum matters. Second, CV and continuous employment matters. But momentum and continuity also matter in other fields.

Academia–more than other fields–cultivates in its trainees (graduate students) the notion that self-identity is wrapped up in one’s area of study. In order to complete a dissertation, it is almost necessary to enter a state of temporary narcissistic insanity, with the student believing that his/her topic is the most important thing in all the world. I’m only slightly exaggerating, and if you think I’m wrong, talk to some professors in the humanities at a research institution.

When you finally achieve that prize, the “PhD,” academia changes your name–not your legal name, but your form of address: you are now “Doctor ____.” No other profession does that except the church or certain government positions. It’s like you’ve been “ordained,” “installed,” “confirmed,” or “sworn-in” as a member of an eternal order: The Order Of Those Who Know More About One Thing Than Anyone Else In The World.

Of course, being called “Doctor” doesn’t make you one. Even having a doctorate doesn’t make you a “doctor” in a meaningful sense. I can’t help you with that sore on the base of your spine! For a while last year, I used “PhD” in my ICON email signature because I felt that it would make some colleagues take my department seriously (a perennial problem). I eventually took it out because it was disingenuous: my doctorate has nothing to do with my work at ICON. My five-year-old son doesn’t care that I have a doctorate; neither do my dentist (though I care that he has a doctorate!), the cashier at the store, or most of my friends. It’s just not relevant to most of life; to those people, I’m not “Doctor Giffone,” I’m “Benj” (“Daddy” to two little people).

Graduate school also breeds in students the sense that failure to complete the degree and attain a tenure-track position is failure at life.[1] The reality, as we all know, is that a small fraction of doctoral students in the humanities will ever have a full-time tenure-track position. (I’m one of the lucky ones who did, but I had to go to Eastern Europe and raise 65% of my own salary.) As is well documented, graduate programs do a good job of teaching adults to think critically, but a poor job of pointing them to ways that they can use those critical skills outside of academia.

I’m one of the lucky ones, I think. I worked in a professional “real-world” job for eight years (and counting), and I have the specialized academic research training. Even though the fields were totally unrelated, the skills I learned in one world helped me in the other (mostly verbal skills and people skills). In retrospect, I’m glad that I didn’t get into one of the stipended PhD programs I applied to in 2009, because six years later I might have a PhD but also more debt and very little in the way of job prospects. My wife wouldn’t be home with the kids; she’d have to work full-time. As it is now, I can feed my family in pharma if teaching doesn’t work out. For me, “PHD” doesn’t stand for “Pizza Hut Driver,” “Pile it Higher and Deeper,” or “Pretty Huge”–well, you know.

I’m glad God gave me at least a year of full-time teaching, because it was so much fun and so meaningful, and because it will (I hope) help me set aside that achievement that I idolized. I do hope that I get back to teaching and research someday (and sooner rather than later), because that’s where my comparative advantage is, I believe. But I don’t need to prove it to myself anymore. And that leaves me more open and (increasingly) willing to use whatever skills and opportunities I have to glorify God–by providing for my family, first and foremost.

[1] Inklings: The “Follow Your Passion” TrapNon-Academic Career Options for PhDs in the Humanities and Social Sciences | Center for Career Education.

In an article, “What Can You Do With a Humanities Ph.D., Anyway?”, Elizabeth Segran writes: “So why are humanities Ph.D.s outside academia so invisible? One reason is that within academic departments there is a culture of stigmatizing doctoral candidates who take non-academic posts, making them less inclined to stick around and contribute to debates about the future of the field. When I spoke to Rosemary Feal, executive director of the MLA, she said, ‘There is a discourse of failure and shame that intimidates Ph.D.s and makes them feel not good enough if they don’t get an academic job.’ This dynamic is a byproduct of a value system that prizes intellectual pursuits over business and industry. ‘Some dissertation advisors are prejudiced against many jobs outside academia that Ph.D.s pursue and find highly satisfying: They cannot imagine a “life of the mind” unless you become a scholar,’ Feal explained.”

Posted in Culture-Economics-Society, Giffones in Lithuania | 2 Comments

Sermon: “The Wrong Kind of Glory”

This is the audio (35:53, 32.8MB) of a sermon delivered at Preakness Valley United Reformed Church on June 28 entitled, “The Wrong Kind of Glory.” The text is 2 Corinthians 11:16-33. I should cite N.T. Wright’s The Resurrection of the Son of God as the source of the notion of the corona muralis parody in verses 30-33.

Here is an excerpt of the sermon:

Paul speaks to the Corinthian church about this impulse to gain the respect and admiration of others, and to have that respect live on beyond our earthly days. He speaks to them harshly but playfully, even sarcastically, because their idea of glory and respect is so skewed away from what it should be. He shows them how absurd their expectations are, but points them instead to his own example as an apostle, and to the example of the Messiah who laid down his life to rescue them.

Audio and text: ©2015 by Benjamin D. Giffone. Reproduction and distribution are permitted, providing that the author is properly credited and that no fee is charged.

Posted in Bible-Theology | Leave a comment

Links: 2 July 2015

The purpose of my “Links” series is to provide interesting and informative reading material so that my readers might think hard, and think well (hmm, has a nice ring to it). It should go without saying that I don’t endorse everything said in every article to which I link.

Sex and marriage:

More:

Something important to think about:

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

Sermon: “A Future and a Hope?”

This is the audio (32:05, 29.3MB) of a sermon delivered at Preakness Valley United Reformed Church on June 28 entitled, “A Future and a Hope?” The text is Jeremiah 29:1-14. Dedicated readers of THTW know that I Love Ruining Bible Verses; this sermon fleshes out some ideas in that post.

Here is an excerpt:

The danger in taking the promises in verse 11 out of context and applying them directly to our lives is that we can so easily replace God’s plans, God’s future, and God’s hope with our plans, our future, and our hope. God is the sovereign Lord of all his creation, including me. He doesn’t have to conform his plans for my life to my plans for my life; he can use me however he chooses. Even when he makes promises to his people because of the special covenant relationship he has with them, he doesn’t always fulfill them as we would want them fulfilled. I’m sure that the exiles in Babylon would not have chosen seventy years, if it had been up to them.

And yet, when we accept God’s plans for our future, we can see that they are infinitely better than our own plans. Yes, God brought Israel back from exile—but things were never as glorious for them as they had hoped. In fact, the spiritual state of exile continues on for hundreds of years–interestingly, in the book of Daniel chapter 9, Daniel is praying based on this Jeremiah passage, and an angel tells him that the exile is not 70 years, but 70 times 7 years! But when the fullness of time had come, Paul says in Galatians, God came to them directly, in the person of Jesus Christ, to rescue his people from their spiritual exile and bondage to sin. That promise of rescue from exile, and a future hope of resurrection from the dead, is offered to all who confess their sin and throw all their hope and trust in Jesus.

Audio and text: ©2015 by Benjamin D. Giffone. Reproduction and distribution are permitted, providing that the author is properly credited and that no fee is charged.

Posted in Bible-Theology | 2 Comments

Too Soon? (or, When Is It OK to Comment on Tragedy?)

While on vacation in San Diego this week, we heard the news on Wednesday evening of the murder of nine people in a black church in Charleston, SC.

(One story that has gotten somewhat lost in the coverage of the shooter and the political debates has been the forgiveness extended to the murderer by the victims’ families–a remarkable story that I am ashamed to relegate to a parenthesis in this post. But that’s not my present purpose.)

In the aftermath of the murders, I noticed that both gun rights advocates and gun control advocates used the situation as an opportunity to further their ideas. On the one side, we heard, “See? This is why we need more restrictions on the possession of guns.” From the other side, we heard, “See? If someone in the church had been carrying a weapon, this could have been stopped.”

If you know me or have been following this blog, you can probably guess where I stand on the gun control issue. That also is not my point here. What I found fascinating was that there were responses to both sets of advocates, complaining that it was too soon to make policy statements, and accusing the advocates of using tragedy to further their agenda. There were advocates on both sides, and critics on both sides who said, “Too soon.”

On the one hand, I completely understand the criticism that says: Let’s allow an appropriate, respectful period of mourning for the victims before making any statements about policy.

But let me briefly defend the “immediate advocates.” Everybody agrees that there are problems in our society, and advocates are people who have very strong opinions about what solve those problems. Most of the time, most people aren’t thinking about gun policy; it is brought into the public eye at these moments of terrible pain and tragedy. Advocates have a brief window of opportunity to make their points convincingly while people are actually paying attention. Whether you believe the answer is more guns or fewer guns, you want to offer your preferred solution while people care. “How many times,” they say, “does this have to happen before we wise up and [encourage concealed carry] or [crack down on gun sales]?” For a week or so, the rest of the public feels the urgency that the advocate feels all the time.

And, how long is long enough? One day? Three days? After the funerals for the victims? A week? A month? We don’t mourn well in our society, and we don’t have a set period of mourning like other cultures do. In cultures with mourning rituals or customs, the mourning period determines which activities are appropriate: wearing certain clothes, abstaining from celebration, celibacy, etc. Then, the period of mourning has a definite end point, at which the individual/family/clan/town/nation in mourning is expected to return to normal patterns of living.

If we had a universally agreed-upon mourning period, then the answer would be simple: first, lament; and then discuss the policy issues afterward. But we have no such period, so advocates will continue to feel that they need to jump on an issue quickly while the public is paying attention, and they will continue to be accused (probably rightly) by others (usually of the opposite opinion) of commenting too quickly.

Posted in Bible-Theology, Culture-Economics-Society | 2 Comments

Links: 5 June 2015

I haven’t posted in a few weeks, so I have accumulated more links to share. Think hard, think well!

Culture/Society:

Bible/Theology:

Global:

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

Review of Biblical Literature: Josef Forsling, “Composite Artistry in the Book of Numbers”

My review of Josef Forsling’s Composite Artistry in the Book of Numbers: A Study in Biblical Narrative Conventions, has been recently published in the Review of Biblical Literature.

Josef Forsling, Composite Artistry in the Book of Numbers: A Study in Biblical Narrative Conventions (Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademi University, 2013). ISBN 978951765706.

(Disclosure statement: I received a free review copy of this book from the publisher through RBL, but was not otherwise compensated for this review.)

Posted in Bible-Theology, Research | Leave a comment

May Update: Greetings from Perkasie!

Dear Friends and Family:

Below you will find our monthly update for May. Be sure to write back and tell us how we can pray for you.

Giffone May 2015 Update

In Christ,

Benj and Corrie Giffone (for Daniel and Elizabeth)

Posted in Giffones in Lithuania | Leave a comment